Full Picture

Article analysis:

The article from Business Daily discusses the slow progress of the Suswa geothermal project in Kenya, which is only one percent complete after 10 years. The Controller of Budget, Margaret Nyakang’o, has raised concerns about the lack of progress on this project, which is expected to generate 300 megawatts of power once completed.

One potential bias in this article could be the focus on the negative aspects of the project without providing a balanced view. While it is important to highlight delays and inefficiencies in such large-scale projects, it would also be beneficial to explore any challenges or obstacles that may have contributed to the slow progress. Additionally, there is a lack of information on what steps are being taken to address these issues and ensure that the project moves forward in a timely manner.

The article mentions a recent deal between Indonesian firm PT Pertamina Geothermal Energy Tbk (PGE) and GDC to develop the Suswa and Longonot geothermal projects. While this development is positive news for the project, more information could have been provided on how this partnership will help expedite the completion of the project and address any existing challenges.

Furthermore, there is limited discussion on potential risks associated with geothermal exploration and development projects. It would have been beneficial for the article to explore environmental concerns, financial risks, or technical challenges that could impact the success of the Suswa geothermal project.

Overall, while the article sheds light on important issues surrounding the Suswa geothermal project, there are areas where more balanced reporting and in-depth analysis could have provided a more comprehensive understanding of the situation. By exploring different perspectives, addressing potential biases, and delving into missing points of consideration, readers can gain a more nuanced view of this complex project.