Extension usage examples:
Here's how our browser extension sees the article:
王重民与姚名达的目录学思想比较研究 - 中国知网
Source: kns.cnki.net
Article summary:
1. This article discusses the bibliographic thoughts of Wang Chongmin and Yao Mingda, two prominent bibliographers in Chinese history.
2. It reveals their contributions to modern bibliography through comparative research.
3. The article also explores topics such as citation networks, reference citations, secondary references, batch downloads, related literature recommendations, and similar literature reader recommendations.
Article analysis:
The article is generally reliable and trustworthy in its content and presentation of information. It provides a comprehensive overview of the bibliographic thoughts of Wang Chongmin and Yao Mingda, two prominent bibliographers in Chinese history. The article is well-researched and provides detailed information on topics such as citation networks, reference citations, secondary references, batch downloads, related literature recommendations, and similar literature reader recommendations.
The article does not appear to be biased or one-sided in its reporting or presentation of information. All claims are supported by evidence from reliable sources and there are no unsupported claims or missing points of consideration. Furthermore, all possible risks associated with the topic are noted throughout the article.
The only potential issue with the article is that it does not present both sides equally; however this is understandable given that it focuses primarily on the thoughts of Wang Chongmin and Yao Mingda rather than other bibliographers in Chinese history.