1. Intimacy is a crucial aspect of marital relationships and lack of intimacy can lead to divorce, emotional distress, and dissatisfaction.
2. Family systems theory highlights the importance of reciprocity, balance between togetherness and individuality, and shared activities or feelings in shaping intimacy among couples.
3. Religion can also influence marital quality by providing guidelines for life and reducing marital conflict through discussions about discrepancies.
The article discusses the factors that affect marital intimacy among Iranian couples. While the literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the importance of intimacy in marriage and its impact on various aspects of marital life, the article has several limitations.
Firstly, the article focuses solely on Iranian couples, which limits its generalizability to other cultures and contexts. The cultural norms and values in Iran may differ significantly from those in other countries, which could affect the factors that influence marital intimacy.
Secondly, the article relies heavily on previous research studies without providing sufficient evidence to support some of its claims. For example, it states that family systems theory can be used to better understand the factors that influence marital intimacy but does not provide any empirical evidence to support this claim.
Thirdly, the article overlooks some important factors that could affect marital intimacy among Iranian couples. For instance, it does not consider how economic stressors or political instability in Iran could impact marital relationships.
Fourthly, while the article acknowledges that women in Iranian culture are expected to take charge of child-related tasks and household chores, it does not explore how gender roles and expectations could affect marital intimacy. This is an important consideration given that gender inequality is prevalent in many societies worldwide.
Finally, the article does not present counterarguments or alternative perspectives on some of its claims. For example, it suggests that sharing time together is necessary for shaping intimacy among couples but does not consider situations where couples may have different interests or preferences for spending their time.
In conclusion, while the article provides valuable insights into factors that influence marital intimacy among Iranian couples, it has several limitations and biases. Future research should consider a more diverse sample population and explore additional factors that could impact marital relationships beyond those discussed in this study.